Your Menstrual Cycle Is Information, Not Limitation
The menstrual cycle is often reduced to reproduction. In truth, it is a constellation of biomarkers that can give us a broader picture of women’s health.
When I was 19, I approached fitness the way many young women do: eat less, move more, and assume the body will eventually respond. Even though I was thin, I didn’t have sculpted abs like the supermodels I admired. I thought I was doing everything right. I was dieting, doing cardio and practicing yoga, but my muscle mass was low, my hair was falling out and I often felt light-headed. I believed losing just a few more pounds would help me achieve a lean physique, so I restricted more.
Eventually, my period disappeared.
My body was responding to a state of low energy availability—a condition in which the body does not have enough energy to support both training demands and basic physiological functions. When this happens, reproductive hormones are often among the first systems to down-regulate.
Losing my menstrual cycle wasn’t a personal failure, but it was feedback. Through this experience, I came to understand that maintaining a strong body and vibrant energy begins with understanding fertility and caring for the menstrual cycle.
The Body’s Hormonal Signaling System
The menstrual cycle is regulated by a hormonal communication system known as the hypothalamic–pituitary–ovarian axis.
The reproductive system and the brain are not separate. The brain, ovaries, and endocrine system work together to coordinate the rise and fall of reproductive hormones, such as estrogen and progesterone.
These hormones interact with multiple physiological systems throughout the body, influencing:
metabolism
insulin sensitivity
appetite regulation
sleep
recovery from exercise
temperature regulation
perceived effort during physical activity
mood
cognition
Research in exercise physiology and endocrinology has shown that hormonal fluctuations across the menstrual cycle can affect substrate metabolism, thermoregulation, and cardiovascular responses to exercise. These changes reflect shifts in the body’s internal hormonal environment rather than simple day-to-day variability.
This helps explain why the experience of training is not always the same from week to week. Some workouts feel easier. Others require more recovery. Hunger may shift. Sleep quality may change. Body temperature tends to rise slightly during the luteal phase, and the same effort in the gym or on a run may feel more or less demanding.
A large systematic review published in Sports Medicine found that while average performance differences across the menstrual cycle tend to be small, individual responses can vary widely.
In other words, physiology changes across the cycle, but how those changes affect training may differ from woman to woman. These fluctuations are often interpreted as inconsistency or lack of discipline, but in many cases they are simply reflections of physiology in motion.
Despite this, women often ignore their body’s signals altogether and push through discomfort.
Understanding the Body’s Signals
In my case, at age 19, the signal was obvious: my menstrual cycle disappeared.
But for many women—and in my experience throughout the years—the effects of physiological strain appear in more subtle ways.
Cycles may become irregular. Ovulation may occur less consistently. Symptoms of premenstrual syndrome may arise. Sleep can become more fragmented. Appetite signals may shift, and fatigue may linger longer after training.
These changes are often dismissed as normal or unavoidable parts of being a woman.
Much of the fitness advice directed toward women assumes that premenstrual symptoms are universal, which can normalize discomfort that may actually reflect underlying health conditions.
In reality, the menstrual cycle isn’t designed to cause pain or discomfort. Mild variation across the cycle is normal, but persistent pain, severe fatigue, or chronic disruption are often signs that the body is under strain.
In the fitness world, this strain can accumulate in many ways:
chronic dieting
insufficient protein intake
high training volumes without adequate recovery
psychological stress
the pursuit of very low body fat levels
Over time, these pressures can alter the hormonal environment that supports a healthy menstrual cycle.
Yet, many women attempt to improve their health and fitness while unknowingly undermining one of the body’s most important indicators of physiological balance.
None of this means that fat loss itself is inherently harmful. Fat loss occurs when the body is in a calorie deficit—when energy expenditure exceeds energy intake. Problems tend to arise when deficits become too aggressive, too prolonged, or poorly supported by adequate nutrition and recovery.
When energy intake remains chronically low relative to training demands, the body may begin conserving energy in ways that affect hormonal balance, recovery capacity, resilience to stress, and reproductive function.
In this context, the menstrual cycle can serve as an important signal. Changes in cycle regularity, worsening symptoms, or disruptions in ovulation may indicate that the balance between training, nutrition, and recovery needs adjustment.
The menstrual cycle reflects the body’s overall state, and when that state changes, the cycle often changes with it.
The Problem With One-Size-Fits-All Cycle Syncing
In recent years, more fitness advice has acknowledged and integrated the menstrual cycle in strategic ways. This is a meaningful step forward. For a long time, female physiology was simply ignored in training and nutrition discussions.
A new problem has emerged: the idea that every woman should follow the same cycle-syncing template.
Many programs now prescribe specific workout styles or calorie targets for each phase of the menstrual cycle. Lift heavy during this phase. Reduce intensity during that phase. Increase carbohydrates here. Decrease them there.
While these frameworks can be helpful starting points, they often assume that every woman’s physiology responds in the same way.
Research suggests otherwise.
As mentioned previously, although hormonal fluctuations across the menstrual cycle do influence metabolism, thermoregulation, substrate use, and recovery, the magnitude of these effects varies widely between individuals.
In practice, this means that two women with similar training programs may experience the same phase of their cycle very differently. One might feel stronger and more energetic. Another may notice little change at all.
The goal, then, is not to force the body into a predetermined template based on cycle phases. It is to observe the signals between fertility, fitness, and real life at an individual biopsychosocial level.
Many mainstream cycle-syncing frameworks recommend minimizing high-intensity exercise during the premenstrual and menstrual phases, assuming that fatigue, cramping, or low mood are inevitable. While this guidance may be helpful for women managing symptoms, it can also reinforce the idea that cyclical discomfort is unavoidable and that premenstrual syndrome is simply a normal part of female physiology.
Since for so long the menstrual cycle was simply not discussed, it’s understandable that many women gravitate toward wellness philosophies that validate their experiences, especially with conditions like premenstrual syndrome, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and others.
However, while some variation across the menstrual cycle is normal, persistent or severe symptoms are not necessarily inevitable. In some cases, they reflect underlying physiological strain rather than an inherent feature of the menstrual cycle itself.
Leaders in women’s health and fitness should be cautious about normalizing pain or persistent discomfort as an inevitable part of the menstrual cycle. Medicine has already done that for too long.
A Different Way to Look at the Cycle
If the menstrual cycle reflects the body’s internal environment, then the question is not how every woman should train during each phase. A more useful question might be: What is the cycle telling us about how the body is responding to training, nutrition, and recovery?
Hormones do not fluctuate randomly. The hormonal rhythm of the menstrual cycle reflects a complex interaction between the brain, the endocrine system, energy availability, stress, and overall physiological health.
Because of this, changes in the cycle can provide meaningful feedback about how the body is adapting to its environment.
For some women, this feedback may appear as shifts in hunger, sleep, or perceived effort during training. For others, it may appear as changes in cycle length, ovulation patterns, or premenstrual symptoms.
These responses do not look identical for everyone.
Which is precisely why generalized cycle-syncing templates often fall short.
Rather than assuming that every woman should train or eat the same way during each phase of the cycle, a more productive approach may be to pay attention to the signals the body provides—the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Over time, patterns begin to emerge. Energy may feel higher during certain weeks. Recovery may require more attention during others. Appetite, sleep, and training performance may shift in ways that reflect the body’s internal hormonal environment.
Seen in this way, the menstrual cycle becomes something different from what it is often portrayed to be.
It is not simply a biological inconvenience or a cause of symptoms. It is data—data about how the body is functioning, how it is adapting, and how it might be supported more effectively. It is a dynamic biological rhythm that both shapes and reflects the state of the body’s physiology.
Introducing the CycleStrong Perspective
Over the years, I’ve used my menstrual cycle data to structure my own blocks of training, recovery, and energy balance. Now I teach this practice to my coaching clients, who have achieved their fitness goals by learning about their unique rhythms.
I’ve come to think of this practice as CycleStrong: a women’s fitness framework that integrates structured, individualized programming using biomarkers as feedback.
The body is constantly communicating through the menstrual cycle. Changes in hunger, recovery, energy, and performance are not random disruptions—they are signals about how the body is adapting. Women have a built-in matrix of signals that we can use to our advantage.
Even as women move through perimenopause and eventually menopause, the practice of observing and applying our biomarkers remains a lifelong skill and a gift that strengthens our ability to care for the body and mind.
Rather than treating the menstrual cycle as something to work around, we can begin to see it as a central physiological rhythm—one that both reflects and interacts with the body’s broader regulatory systems. When we learn to interpret this rhythm, training becomes less about forcing the body into rigid plans and more about riding the body’s physiological waves.
The menstrual cycle is not a limitation; it is information.
And information is power.
Sources
De Souza, M. J., Nattiv, A., Joy, E., Misra, M., Williams, N. I., Mallinson, R. J., Gibbs, J. C., Olmsted, M., Goolsby, M., & Matheson, G. (2014).
2014 Female Athlete Triad Coalition consensus statement on treatment and return to play of the female athlete triad.
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(4), 289.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-093218
Isacco, L., Duche, P., & Boisseau, N. (2012).
Influence of hormonal status on substrate utilization at rest and during exercise in the female population.
Sports Medicine, 42(4), 327–342.
https://doi.org/10.2165/11598900-000000000-00000Loucks, A. B., Kiens, B., & Wright, H. H. (2011).
Energy availability in athletes.
Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(sup1), S7–S15.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.588958McNulty, K. L., Elliott-Sale, K. J., Dolan, E., Swinton, P. A., Ansdell, P., Goodall, S., Thomas, K., & Hicks, K. M. (2020).
The effects of menstrual cycle phase on exercise performance in eumenorrheic women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sports Medicine, 50, 1813–1827.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01319-3Mountjoy, M., Sundgot-Borgen, J., Burke, L., et al. (2018).
IOC consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S): 2018 update.
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52(11), 687–697.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099193Oosthuyse, T., & Bosch, A. N. (2010).
The effect of the menstrual cycle on exercise metabolism: Implications for exercise performance in eumenorrheic women.
Sports Medicine, 40(3), 207–227.
https://doi.org/10.2165/11317090-000000000-00000Reed, B. G., & Carr, B. R. (2018).
The normal menstrual cycle and the control of ovulation.
In Endotext. MDText.com, Inc.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279054/Sims, S. T., & Heather, A. K. (2018).
Myths and methodologies: Reducing scientific design ambiguity in studies comparing sexes and/or menstrual cycle phases.
Experimental Physiology, 103(10), 1309–1317.
https://doi.org/10.1113/EP086797
